Andres Gomez v. Nike, Inc.
| Andres Gomez |
| Nike, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv04459 |
| June 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Andre Birotte |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Ribakoff, Jason) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez, upon Defendant Nike, Inc. served on 6/22/2015, answer due 8/12/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kirsten Edralin, SOP Intake Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. /s Jason Ribakoff (Ribakoff, Jason) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nike, Inc. answer now due 8/12/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Nike, Inc..(Attorney David J Dow added to party Nike, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dow, David) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Judge Andre Birotte Jr. is participating in a pilot project regarding the submission of SEALED DOCUMENTS. All proposed sealed documents must be submitted, via e-mail, to the Judge's Chambers email at AB_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. Please refer to the Judge's procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nike, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jp) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Ribakoff, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez, (Ribakoff, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Ribakoff, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-15893074 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintff Andres Gomez. (Attorney Jason Louis Ribakoff added to party Andres Gomez(pty:pla))(Ribakoff, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andres Gomez v. Nike, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andres Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Jason Louis Ribakoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nike, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David J Dow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
