Jose Medardo Rodriguez et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
| Jose Medardo Rodriguez and Claudia Sanchez |
| Denise Anaya, Bristol Associates, LLC, Continental Financial Network, Federal National Mortgage Association, John Does, Tuan Le, Amy Esther McAllister, Professional Protection Group, Fernando Rios, The Foremost Law and Rhonda K. Walker |
| 2:2015cv04890 |
| June 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vv)
|
|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 32 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Judgment shall be, and hereby is, entered against Plaintiffs Jose Medardo Mortgage Association. Defendant is hereby dismissed from Plaintiffs action with prejudice, Plaintiffs shall take nothing against Defendant, and each party shall bear its own costs and fees. (lc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, the Court GRANTS Defendants Tuan Le, Amy Esther McAlister, The Foremost Law Group, and Rhonda K. Walker's Motion to Dismiss Complaint without leave to amend. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
