Spencer Brasure v. Ron Davis
Petitioner: Spencer R. Brasure
Respondent: Ron Davis
Case Number: 2:2015cv04938
Filed: June 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Order Denying and Dismissing Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus dated September 25, 2015, the PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS is DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner bring these claims after the complete exhaustion of his state court remedies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spencer Brasure v. Ron Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Spencer R. Brasure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ron Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?