Zebra Technologies Corporation et al v. Expeditors International Ocean, Inc. et al
Affiliated FM Insurance Company and Zebra Technologies Corporation |
China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd., China Shipping North America Agency Co. Inc, Does, Expeditors International Ocean, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. |
BNSF Railway Company |
China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd. |
2:2015cv05022 |
July 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Contract: Marine |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, having considered the parties' stipulation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 53 , hereby dismisses the entire action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its costs and fees. (gk) |
Filing 52 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled 51 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.