Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. |
Does, Havas Worldwide New York, Inc., TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation and TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc. |
2:2015cv05024 |
July 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 163 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: DENYING 160 MOTION to Vacate the March 14, 2016 Order. (shb) |
Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 95 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the reasons set forth above, the court GRANTS Lions Gate's Motion for Reconsideration and revises its prior Order to DENY Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs cause of action for trademark dilution. (lom) |
Filing 87 ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 49 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For all the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom) |
Filing 86 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp) |
Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Upon Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion 14 , Defendants must submit their responsive filing no later than 14 days after the date of the order ruling on the pending motion to dismiss in the Southern District of New York case. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.