Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lions Gate Entertainment Inc.
Defendant: Does, Havas Worldwide New York, Inc., TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation and TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv05024
Filed: July 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: DENYING 160 MOTION to Vacate the March 14, 2016 Order. (shb)
August 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 95 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the reasons set forth above, the court GRANTS Lions Gate's Motion for Reconsideration and revises its prior Order to DENY Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs cause of action for trademark dilution. (lom)
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 49 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For all the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 86 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Upon Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion 14 , Defendants must submit their responsive filing no later than 14 days after the date of the order ruling on the pending motion to dismiss in the Southern District of New York case. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Havas Worldwide New York, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Ameritrade Services Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lions Gate Entertainment Inc.
Represented By: Jill M Pietrini
Represented By: Whitney Beth Walters-Sachs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?