Marguise Caliz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Marquise Elmo Caliz
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Deputy Simms, Unknown and Unknown Deputies/Deputy
Case Number: 2:2015cv05161
Filed: July 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 197 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment 168 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the stay on discovery in connection with Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Benavidez and Tran is LIFTED. A case management and scheduling order will issue separately. (see document for further details) (hr)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 152 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before October 12, 2018 why the action should not be dismissed under Local Rule 7-12 and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (see order for further details) (hr)
May 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. More than two weeks have now passed since Plaintiff's May 3, 2018 deadline for filing copies of the USM-285 forms with the Court, and the Court has not received copies of Plaintif f's completed USM-285 forms or any other filing reflecting compliance with the Court's April 3, 2018 Order. However, in the interests of justice, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before June 21, 2018, why the Court should not rec ommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders. Plaintiff is further advised that his deadline for completing service of the SAC is July 2, 2018. (See document for further details.) 1 , 126 , 129 , 128 , 4 (sbou)
March 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton for NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 1 102 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 110 . The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days of the date of this Order, EITHER: a signed document entitled Notice Of Intent Not To File Second Amended Complaint or a Motion for Leave to Amend and a proposed Second Amended Complaint (see order for further details). (hr)
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Final) 47 . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the state tort claims against Deputy Simms are DISMISSED with prejudice; and (2) Defendant Simms shall file an Answer to the Complaint, as amended by the Report, within 30 days of the date of this Order (sbu)
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs claims against the City of Los Angeles is GRANTED; and (2) the claims against the City of Los Angeles are DISMISSED with prejudice. (sbu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marguise Caliz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquise Elmo Caliz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Simms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Deputies/Deputy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?