Bella Norris v. County of Los Angeles et al
||Kamal Bijanpour, Chris Chen, County of Los Angeles, Does, Dianna Hamed, Viveca Hazboun, Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. and Sherman Oaks Hospital
||July 13, 2015
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Dolly M. Gee
||Michael R. Wilner
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 24, 2017
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Order for details) re Stipulation for Protective Order 79 (vm)
|August 1, 2016
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 15, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants County of Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks Hospital, Chris Chen, Viveca Hazboun, and Dianna Hamed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one o f the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the following defendant(s): County of Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks Hospital, Chris Chen, Viveca Hazboun, and Dianna Hamed; Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (clee)
|November 18, 2015
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 2, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed f or lack of prosecution as to defendant Dianna Hamed. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Dianna Hamed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?