Maria Antonia Barrera v. City of Lynwood et al
Maria Antonia Barrera |
City of Lynwood and Does |
2:2015cv05470 |
July 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J. Walsh |
John F. Walter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The Court has reviewed the pretrial documents filed by the parties and discovered that Defendant City of Lynwood (Defendant) has failed to file the Declarations of Witness Direct Testimony, a Trial Br ief, and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as required by Section 7 of the Courts Scheduling and Case Management Order 18 . Accordingly, Defendant is ordered to show cause in writing, on or before May 13, 2016, why the Court should not enter a n order precluding it from calling any witnesses, why its answer should not be stricken, and/or why sanctions in the amount of $3,500.00 should not be imposed against defense counsel for failure to file the required documents. No oral argument o n this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of the foregoing sanctions. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.