Rickey B Reed v. KPS Alarms Inc.
Plaintiff: Rickey B Reed
Defendant: KPS Alarms Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv05482
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 87 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the Courts Order granting Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 29, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant KPS Alarms, Inc., and against Plaintiff Rickey B. Reed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kti)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rickey B Reed v. KPS Alarms Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KPS Alarms Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rickey B Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?