Zevonzell E. Sims v. W. L. Mongomery
Petitioner: Zevonzell E. Sims
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Case Number: 2:2015cv05484
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge 15 , IT IS ADJUDGED that that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)
July 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/28/2015. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zevonzell E. Sims v. W. L. Mongomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Zevonzell E. Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?