Marie Rodney v. Pennymac Loan Services LLC.
Plaintiff: Marie Rodney
Defendant: Pennymac Loan Services LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv05548
Filed: July 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge: Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant PennyMac Loan Services, LLC ("PennyMac"), and against Plaintiff Marie Rodney. Plaintiff shall take and recover nothing in this action against PennyMac. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marie Rodney v. Pennymac Loan Services LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennymac Loan Services LLC
Represented By: Cheryl S Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Rodney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?