Minx International, Inc. v. Rue 21 Inc et al
Plaintiff: Minx International, Inc.
Defendant: Does and Rue 21 Inc
Case Number: 2:2015cv05645
Filed: July 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 69 . The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for default judgment against Club House with respect to plaintiffs claim for copyright infringem ent. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff on its claim for copyright infringement. Defendant shall be liable to plaintiff in the amount of $41,547.93 ($38,151.52 for profits attributable to infringement; $2,889.09 for reasonable attorneys' fees; and $507.32 in litigation costs). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - APPLICATION OF NIXON PEABODY LLP TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR RUE 21 INC. 55 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Upon consideration of the Application the Court finds good cause to permit counsel to withdraw. Accordi ngly, the Application is GRANTED. Stacy Riordan and Neal Guager are hereby relieved as counsel for Rue. On March 16, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of partial settlement notifying the Court of its intent to file a dismissal of all claims against Rue. Dkt. 57 . Rue is a corporate entity and therefore may not appear pro se. L.R. 832.9.2.3. Nixon Peabody, LLP shall serve a c opy of this minute order on defendant Rue forthwith. Notwithstanding Rue's apparent settlement with plaintiff and plaintiff's indication that it will dismiss claims against Rue, Nixon Peadbody, LLP is ordered to notify Rue of its obligation to obtain counsel, should it seek to make any further appearance in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 19 . Defendant Club House Creation's motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minx International, Inc. v. Rue 21 Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rue 21 Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minx International, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Jarvis Cohen
Represented By: Daniel David Hoffman
Represented By: Chan Yong Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?