Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Taisei Construction Corporation
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America |
| Does and Taisei Construction Corporation |
| 2:2015cv05677 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
JUDGMENT AFTER REMAND FROM THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED (see document for further details) Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 164 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Company of America ("Travelers") and against defendant Taisei Construction Corporation ( "Taisei"). Counter-Claimant Taisei shall have no recovery against Travelers. Travelers had the right to control the defense of Taisei in the underlying action of Wilshire Vermont Housing Partners, LP v. Taisei Construction Corp. et al., fil ed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC504178 ("Underlying Action"). Taisei at no point had a right to independent counsel funded by Travelers for the defense of Taisei in the Underlying Action. Tai sei breached its duty to cooperate with Travelers by demanding that the firm of Lee, Hernandez, Landrum, Garofalo & Blake withdraw as Taisei's counsel in the Underlying Action. Travelers is not obligated to pay for fees and costs incurred throug h any other counsel after Travelers' appointment of the firm of Lee, Hernandez, Landrum, Garofalo & Blake to defend Taisei in the Underlying Action. Travelers shall have and recover the sum of $120,364.59 from Taisei as Travelers' damages pursuant to Travelers' claims for equitable reimbursement and breach of contract, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date of entry of this judgment. Each party is to bear its own costs in this action. (gk)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the action has been settled 76 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the ri ght, upon good cause shown within 90 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
34
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real, re Stipulation 33 . See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
