Jason Edwin Devore v. David R. Dominguez et al
| Jason Edwin Devore |
| California Department of Justice Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, David R Dominguez, Jim McDonnell and Hector Villagra |
| 2:2015cv06291 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Fourth Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. 155 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Defendants motion to dismiss is granted 44 . Plaintiffs claims against Defendants McDonnell and McDonald in their official capacity are dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiffs remaining claims are dismissed with leave to amend. ( See document for further information). Report and Recommendation (Issued) 64 (twdb) Modified on 4/11/2018 (twdb).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES AND CLOSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
