Carl Bennett v. Conrad Graber
Petitioner: Carl Bennett
Respondent: Conrad Graber
Case Number: 2:2015cv06320
Filed: August 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than September 28, 2015 why this action can proceed under § 2241 or why, in the alternative, it should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carl Bennett v. Conrad Graber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Conrad Graber
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?