Michael Wendell Harris v. Martin Biter
Petitioner: Michael W Harris
Respondent: Martin Biter
Case Number: 2:2015cv06431
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Gail J. Standish
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Martin Biter against Michael W Harris Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 10 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR UNTIMELINESS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/21/2015. (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Wendell Harris v. Martin Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Martin Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael W Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?