Gregory C. Bontemps v. K. Penate
Plaintiff: Gregory C Bontemps
Defendant: K. Penate
Case Number: 2:2015cv06648
Filed: August 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. More than 30 days have now passed, and plaintiff has not paid any of the full filing fee owed, that is, $350.00. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. (See document for further details.) (Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (iva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregory C. Bontemps v. K. Penate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory C Bontemps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Penate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?