Puretek Corporation v. Patchwerx Labs, Inc. et al
| Puretek Corporation |
| Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals Plus Inc, Maximed, Patchwerx Labs , Inc., Patchwerx Labs, Inc, Safe Chain Solutions, LLC and Paul Smith |
| 2:2015cv07044 |
| September 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
REVISED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth re Notice of Lodging 102 . (See Order for details) [Note Changes Made By The Court]. (bem)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth re Stipulation for Protective Order 86 . (See Order for details) [Note Changes Made By the Court]. (bem)
|
|
Filing
48
IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before January 25, 2016 why this action should not be dismis sed as to defendant Maximed for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Maximed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow against Defendant PATCHWERX. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each Party shall bear its/her/his own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the enforcement of this injunction as the ends of justice may require. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants PATCHWERX and Paul Smith shall have through November 16, 2015 to respond to the FAC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PURETEK and PATCHWERX shall, discuss a complete settlement of this action including any financial payment, with all communications and documents related thereto protected under Fed. R. Evid. 408(a). (See attached document for details.) (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
