Oksana Baiul-Farina v. Joseph Charles Lemire et al
| Oksana Baiul-Farina |
| Does, Joseph Charles Lemire, Olympic Champions Ltd, Olympic Champions Ltd. and Republic of Ukraine |
| 2:2015cv07325 |
| September 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This Court, having dismissed Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (FAC) with prejudice and denied Plaintiffs Motion For Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants is hereby entered dismissing Plaintiffs FAC with prejudice. (shb)
|
|
Filing
117
AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Plaintiffs motion to remand is DENIED. Defendants Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiffs FAC is DISMISSED, with prejudice. (shb)
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED, without prejudice 27 . (lc)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED the MOTION TO REMAND 27 AND 31 set for December 14, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., are hereby taken off calendar, the hearing date vacated and will be decided without oral argument. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
