Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. CashCall, Inc. et al
| Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
| Cashcall Inc, Delbert Services Corporation, J Paul Reddam and WS Funding, LLC |
| 2:2015cv07522 |
| September 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A. Oliver |
| John F. Walter |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
374
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. A judgment for restitution is entered against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $134,058,600. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
|
Filing
321
JOINT JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter as follows: Pursuant to 12 USC section 5565(c)(1), defendants CashCall, Inc., WS Funding, LLC, Delbert Services Corporation, and J. Paul Reddam must pay a civil money penalty of $10,283,886 to the Bureau. D efendants liability for this penalty is joint and several. (2) Defendants must pay the civil money penalty by wire transfer to the Bureau or the Bureau agent, in compliance with the Bureau wiring instructions. (3) Defendants shall pay the full amount of the civil money penalty within 65 days of entry of this Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
319
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge John F. Walter: In light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the CFPB failed to meet its burden of proving that either restitution or a permanent injunction is an a ppropriate remedy and, therefore, the Court will not award restitution or impose a permanent injunction. The Court also concludes that a Tier One statutory penalty in the amount of $10,283,886 is appropriate. Accordingly, the Court issues judgme nt in favor of the CFPB in the amount of $10,283,886 and finds that Defendants are jointly and severally liable. Counsel for the parties are ordered to meet and confer and prepare a joint proposed Judgment which is consistent with this Order. Th e parties shall file the proposed Judgment with the Court by 1/26/2018. In the unlikely event that counsel are unable to agree upon a joint proposed Judgement, the parties shall each submit separate versions of a proposed Judgment along with a Joint Statement setting forth their respective positions no later than 1/26/2018. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
