Jovani Banuelos v. A.C.C. Company et al
Plaintiff: Jovani Banuelos
Defendant: A.C.C. Company, Burton Way Hotels LLC and Does
Case Number: 2:2015cv07954
Filed: October 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to F.R.CIV.P.41(a)(1) 33 , this action is hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Defendants, and each of them, are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing on or before June 1, 2016, why their answer should not be stricken and their default entered for failure to comply with their discovery obligations. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz)
January 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties show cause in writing no later than January 22, 2016, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to participate in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The Scheduling Conference set for hearing on January 22, 2016 is hereby VACATED. (iv)
December 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 15, 2015 why this action should not be dismisse d for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jovani Banuelos v. A.C.C. Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.C.C. Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burton Way Hotels LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jovani Banuelos
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Mark D Potter
Represented By: Center for Disability Access
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?