JMT Inc. v. Intermatic Inc. et al
| JMT Inc. |
| Broan-Nutone LLC, Does and Intermatic Inc. |
| 2:2015cv08603 |
| November 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Tort Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
212
ORDER On Stipulation of Dismissal 21 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips that theabove-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Allparties to bear their own costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
176
JUDGMENT FOLLOWING JURY VERDICT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell is hereby entered in favor of defendant INTERMATIC and against plaintiffs JMT, INC,. and SENTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Plaintiffs shall recover nothing against defendant INTERMAT IC and the actions filed by plaintiffs JMT, INC., and SENTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY shall be dismissed on their merits as to defendant INTERMATIC, with prejudice. Defendant INTERMATIC, as the prevailing party, is entitled to recover costs from plaintiffs JMT, INC. and SENTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, jointly and severally, pursuant to FRCP 54 and Local Rule 54. (jp)
|
|
Filing
35
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 34 . See order for details. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
