United States of America v. Mary Derparseghian et al
United States of America |
Mary Derparseghian, First Technology Federal Cedit Union, Kinecta Federal Credit Union, MDP Family Trust Dated September 27, 2011 and State of California Franchise Tax Board |
2:2015cv08653 |
November 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Taxes |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 62 , Judgment is entered in favor of the United States of America and against Mary Derparseghian aka Mary Der-Parseghian aka Mary Der Parseghian, Defendant, in the amount of $257,336.01 plus all statutory accruals including interest from 2/3/2017, until payment plus costs. The federal tax liens at issue in this case are foreclosed. These liens attach to the property commonly referred to as 3805 Ranch Top Road, Pasadena, California 91107 , with a parcel number of 5759034002. The property is ordered to be sold. The Clerk of the District Court is directed to accept the proceeds of the sale and deposit it into the Court's registry for distribution pursuant to further order of the Court. See document for sales proceeds and further details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Filing 54 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised that the above-entitled action has been settled 53 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the rig ht, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Filing 47 (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 19, 2016, why this action should not be dismiss ed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Filing 27 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 6, 2016, why this action should not be d ismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.