Scott Joseph Wallace v. Cellco Partnership et al
| Scott Joseph Wallace |
| AT and T Mobility LLC, Chief Charlie Beck, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Cellco Partnership, City and County of Los Angeles, Does, Mayor Eric Michael Garcetti and Harris Corporation |
| 2:2015cv08680 |
| November 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, show cause in writing why these actions should not be dismissed without prejudice against Chief Beck and Harris and why Wallace II should not be dismissed without prejudice against Mayor Garcetti, for failure to effect service of process within the time specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (See Order for complete details) (afe)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONSOLIDATION by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within ten (10) days from the date of this Order why Wallace I (case no. CV 14-8052 DSF (AS)) and Wallace II (case no. CV 15-8680 DSF (AS)) should not be consolidated. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
