Matthew Johnson et al v. David Mazza et al
| Alacrity Capital Offshore Fund, LTD., Gemini Partners, Inc., Matthew Johnson and Nathan Johnson |
| Christopher Allegretti, Does, HA and W Wealth Management LLC, HBK Sorce Financial, LLC, Habif, Arogeti and Wynne, LLP, Hill, Barth and King LLC, David Mazza, Joseph D. Simms, Paul M. West and Anthony Allen Wood |
| 2:2015cv09183 |
| November 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS HA&W WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC; HABIF, AROGETI AND WYNNE, LLP; and JOSEPH D. SIMMS 131 AND DISMISSING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL 126 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 3/29/2017 (lc).
|
|
Filing
110
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On February 17, 2017, this Court granted defendants Christopher Allegretti and Hill Barth & King LLCs (collectively HBK) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings without leave to amend as to all causes of action asse rted against HBK on the operative Second Amended Complaint on file. Plaintiffs Matthew Johnson, Nathan Johnson, Gemini Partners Inc., and Alacrity Capital Offshore Fund, Ltd.s take nothing on, under or by virtue of their Second Amended Complaint as against Christopher Allegretti and Hill Barth & King LLC, that judgment be entered on behalf of Christopher Allegretti and Hill Barth & King LLC, and that Defendants HBK are entitled recover their costs. (lc)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS 90 , DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTIONTO STRIKE, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 95 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion toDismiss Mazzas counterclaims and DENIES LEAVE TO AMEND for all of Mazzas causes of action except Paul Wests separate claim for intentionalinterference with a contract. (ECF No. 90.) Any amended Countercomplaint must befiled within 30 days of the date of this Order. The Court furthe r DENIES Plaintiffs special Motion to Strike and GRANTS Allegretti and HBKs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 95). As an administrative matter, Defendants Allegretti and HBKs Motion forJudgment on the Pleadings noticed at ECF No. 93 is STRICKEN AS MOOT in lightof the corrected motion filed at ECF NO. 95. (lc)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE 69 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Johnsons Motion to Strike Mazzas counterclaims as a meritless SLAPP a ction is DENIED, and Johnsons Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) is GRANTED with leave to amend as to Mazzas counterclaims for Intentional Interference with a Contract, Negligent Interference with a Contract, Fraud, and Conspiracy, and GRANTED without leave to amend as to Mazzas counterclaim for Equitable Estoppel. Mazzas entire counterclaim is thus to DISMISSED, with leave to amend as to causes of action 1, 2, 4, and 5. (lc) Modified on 10/4/2016 (lc).
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 41 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc),Modified on 7/6/2016 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
