John R. Chase v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. et al
| John R. Chase |
| Does, Law Offices of Les Zieve, Ocwen Loan Services LLC and Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv09224 |
| November 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not dismiss Plaintiff's case against the Law Offices of Lez Zieve for failure toprosecute. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 62933 (1962). Plaintiffsresponse to this Order must be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on Friday, April 1, 2016. If Plaintiff does not respond to this Order, the Court will dismiss the case against the Law Offices of Les Zieve, and close the case in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not grant RCS's Motion. Both (1) Plaintiff's response to this Order and (2) Plaintiff's opposition to RCSs Motion, if any, shall be filed by no later 4:00 p.m. on Friday, March 11, 2016. (rfi) (Main Document 37 replaced on 3/9/2016) (rfi).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
