Keno V. Thomas v. Liberty Media Corp. et al
| Keno V. Thomas |
| Chris Albrecht, Does, Liberty Media Corp., Starz, Starz Entertainment LLC, Starz,LLC and Michael Thornton |
| 2:2015cv09239 |
| November 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Labor: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Joint Stipulation Regarding Plaintiff's Request to Exceed Ten Depositions 109 . Plaintiff's request to exceed ten depositions is GRANTED without prejudice to defendants' being per mitted to object to specific depositions. Consistent with the Court's prior indication, each side may conduct up to 14 non-expert depositions, which shall include any 30(b)(6) depositions to be noticed. Insofar as the parties dispute the propriety of permitting specific depositions of high-level management at Starz, the parties' arguments are more appropriately addressed to the Magistrate Judge. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
103
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re Stipulation for Protective Order 102 . (ib)
|
|
Filing
80
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant Starz's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 76 . The Court finds that plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded his section 1102.5(b) claim and Starz's motion to dismiss plaintiff's first claim of retaliation is DENIED. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint 21 ; Defendant's Motion to Strike 22 . The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff� 39;s motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Specifically, the Court grants without prejudice defendant's motion to dismiss defendant Albrecht from this action and plaintiff's First , Second, and Seventh claims for relief. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein within 30 days. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of defendant Albrecht and plaintiff's claims with prejudice. In addition, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants' motion to strike portions of plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). Specifically, the Court grants defendants' motion to strikes paragraphs 27, 28, and Exhibit C from the complaint. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
