Boris Bonilla v. Clark E.Ducart
Petitioner: Boris Bonilla
Respondent: Clark E. Ducart
Case Number: 2:2015cv09287
Filed: December 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus if denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. In re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mkr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boris Bonilla v. Clark E.Ducart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Boris Bonilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Clark E. Ducart
Represented By: Kenneth C Byrne
Represented By: Shira Seigle Markovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?