Richard B. Sarafian v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Richard B Sarafian |
Does, Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. |
2:2015cv09397 |
December 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Christina A. Snyder |
Karen L. Stevenson |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate Cases 85 . Plaintiffs motions to consolidate are GRANTED. The Court orders the consolidation of Case Nos. 2:15-cv-09397-CAS and 2:15-cv-07102- CAS. All further filings in these cases shall be made under Case No. 2:15-cv-07102-CAS. The Clerk shall administratively close Case No. 2:15-cv-09397-CAS. The parties shall file a joint, proposed scheduling order forthwith. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk) |
Filing 70 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 69 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (es) |
Filing 54 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant Wright Medical Group, Inc.'s ("WMG") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) 26 . Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of defendant WMG from this action with prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.