Steven D Young v. William Muniz
Petitioner: Steven D Young
Respondent: Warden William Muniz
Case Number: 2:2015cv09840
Filed: December 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: Pursuant to the Order Denying Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Petition is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Adopting Report & Recommendation 19 ; Lifting the Kelly Stay of Proceedings by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: (see document image for further details). The Report and Recommendation [Doc #19] is ADOPTED without objection. The previously granted Kelly stay of these habeas proceedings is LIFTED. (ad)
October 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Kelly Stay Should Not Be Vacated For Failure to File a Status Report by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/21/2016. (dts)
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, 1. A Kelly stay is GRANTED. This action -- now containing only the exhausted Claim 1 -- is hereby stayed pending exhaustion of Petitioner's state court remedies on other grounds and/or further order o f this Court. 2. Beginning July 5, 2016, and every ninety (90) days thereafter, Petitioner shall file a Status Report with the Court, addressing the status of Petitioner's exhaustion efforts in state court. Petitioner must provide the case num ber of the pending state court proceedings, if available. Respondent may file a status report within fourteen (14) days following Petitioner's filing, if Respondent wishes to advise the Court of any developments not reported by Petitioner. 3. Within thirty (30) days after any decision by the state court on Petitioners habeas petition, Petitioner shall advise this Court of the decision. Further, if Petitioner abandons his efforts to exhaust his state court remedies, he shall immediately advise this Court. 4. Petitioner is cautioned that if he fails to act diligently in seeking to exhaust his state court remedies or fails to act within the time frames discussed above, the Court may vacate the stay and prohibit Petitioner from raising any new claims in this action. (dts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven D Young v. William Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden William Muniz
Represented By: Jennifer Ora Cano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven D Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?