Genzyme Corporation v. Genentech, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation
Defendant: City of Hope and Genentech, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv09991
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2016 Filing 94 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order of Dismissal) (mrgo)
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTIONS by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #91 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
August 18, 2016 Filing 92 MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge George H. Wu: Parties advise the Court that settlement is reached and being finalized. The Court continues the statusconference to August 29, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are advised that the status conference will bevacated and no appearance will be required provided that a Stipulation to Dismiss, with a proposedorder, is filed by noon on August 25, 2016.All previously set deadlines and dates are vacated and taken off-calendar. Court Reporter: Lisa M. Gonzalez. (kss)
August 18, 2016 Filing 91 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Durie, Daralyn)
August 4, 2016 Filing 90 MINUTES OF MARKMAN HEARING held before Judge George H. Wu. Markman Hearing continued to 8/18/2016 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu: Having considered the Joint Stipulation to Continue Mediation Conference ("the Stipulation"), the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: The Stipulation is GRANTED. The Post-Mediation Status Conference set for August 4, 2016 is continued to September 8, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. (cr)
August 1, 2016 Filing 88 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Mediation Conference from August 4, 2016 to September 8, 2016 filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mann, Elizabeth)
July 21, 2016 Filing 87 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc., Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. correcting Brief (non-motion non-appeal),, #75 / Notice of Errata to the Declaration Of Adam R. Brausa In Support of Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief: Correction of Docket # [75-13] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "Corrected" Exh. 10 to Adam R. Brausa Declaration)(Brausa, Adam)
July 18, 2016 Filing 86 MINUTES OF TUTORIAL HEARING held before Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets the following in the Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, et al. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., CV 15-5685-GW(AGRx) matter: Opening brief July 21, 2016; Opposition August 4, 2016; Reply August 11, 2016; Motion hearing August 18, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. The motions in the Sanofi-Aventis action set for August 18, 2016 are VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo)
July 14, 2016 Filing 85 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sonal Naresh Mehta counsel for Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc., Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. Adding Sonal N. Mehta as counsel of record for Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (Attorney Sonal Naresh Mehta added to party City of Hope(pty:dft), Attorney Sonal Naresh Mehta added to party City of Hope(pty:cc), Attorney Sonal Naresh Mehta added to party Genentech, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Sonal Naresh Mehta added to party Genentech, Inc.(pty:dft))(Mehta, Sonal)
July 13, 2016 Filing 84 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Christian G Kiely counsel for Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc., Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. Changing Firm Name to Todd & Weld LLP. Changing e-mail to ckiely@toddweld.com. Filed by Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (Kiely, Christian)
July 13, 2016 Filing 83 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christian G Kiely counsel for Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc., Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. Christian G Kiely is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (Kiely, Christian)
July 13, 2016 Filing 82 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge George H. Wu: The Court, on its own motion, CONTINUES the MARKMAN HEARING, presently set for July 21, 2016 to August 4, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER ON STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re Stipulation for Protective Order #80 . The parties having entered into a Stipulated Protective Order providing the terms and conditions for the confidentiality of all information, documents, and other items subject to discovery in this action and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2016. (Attachments: #1 Protective Order) (mp)
July 6, 2016 Filing 80 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mann, Elizabeth)
July 5, 2016 Filing 79 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge George H. Wu: On the Court's own motion, the Tutorial Hearing previously scheduled for 07/11/2016 is CONTINUED to 7/18/2016 at 08:30 AM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 1, 2016 Filing 78 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation. Plaintiff's Responsive Claim Construction Brief regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal),, #74 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard McCormick, #2 Exhibit U to McCormick Decl, #3 Exhibit V to McCormick Decl)(McCormick, Richard)
July 1, 2016 Filing 77 BRIEF filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief) regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal),, #75 . (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Declaration of Adam R. Brausa, #2 Exhibit 14 to Brausa Decl., #3 Exhibit 15 to Brausa Decl., #4 Exhibit 16 to Brausa Decl.)(Durie, Daralyn)
June 27, 2016 Filing 76 ANSWER to Amended Counterclaim, #73 filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation.(Mann, Elizabeth)
June 24, 2016 Filing 75 BRIEF filed by Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. / Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adam R. Brausa, #2 Exhibit 1 (Part 1 of 2), #3 Exhibit 1 (Part 2 of 2), #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3 (Part 1 of 2), #6 Exhibit 3 (Part 2 of 2), #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11, #15 Exhibit 12, #16 Exhibit 13)(Durie, Daralyn)
June 24, 2016 Filing 74 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard J. McCormick, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, part 1, #4 Exhibit B, part 2, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O, #18 Exhibit P, #19 Exhibit Q, #20 Exhibit R, #21 Exhibit S, #22 Exhibit T)(Mann, Elizabeth)
June 9, 2016 Filing 73 First AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Genzyme Corporation amending Counterclaim, Amended Complaint/Petition, #40 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc., City of Hope(Brausa, Adam)
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO ALLOW GENENTECH, INC. AND CITY OF HOPE TO FILE ANSWER AND FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST GENZYME, INC. by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Amend/Correct #71 . It is hereby ordered that Genentech and City of Hope be granted leave to file their Answer and First Amended Counterclaims. (bp)
June 3, 2016 Filing 71 Joint STIPULATION to Amend Answer to Complaint, #46 filed by Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Brausa, Adam)
May 3, 2016 Filing 70 STATEMENT JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRELIMINARY STATEMENT (Mann, Elizabeth)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #68 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kelly Halford on behalf of Defendant, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
March 17, 2016 Filing 68 APPLICATION for attorney Kelly Halford to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17477888 paid.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
March 14, 2016 Filing 67 ANSWER to Counterclaim (Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Counterclaim) filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Genzyme Corporation.(Mann, Elizabeth)
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #64 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Christian G. Kiely on behalf of Defendants, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #63 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Amanda L. Major on behalf of Defendants, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
March 4, 2016 Filing 64 APPLICATION for attorney Christian G. Kiely to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17406450 paid.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
March 4, 2016 Filing 63 APPLICATION for attorney Amanda L. Major to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17406125 paid.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
March 4, 2016 Filing 62 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 2/18/2016 at 9:10 a.m. re Transcript #61 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Ponce, Myra) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 4, 2016 Filing 61 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 2/18/2016 at 9:10 a.m. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Myra Ponce, e-mail address myraponce@sbcglobal.net. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/25/2016. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/4/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/2/2016. (Ponce, Myra)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #56 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Robert J. Gunther, Jr. on behalf of Defendants, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #55 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David L. Cavanaugh on behalf of Defendants, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #57 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kevin S. Prussia on behalf of Defendants, designating Christopher T. Casamassima as local counsel. (lt)
February 24, 2016 Filing 57 APPLICATION for attorney Kevin S. Prussia to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17345823 paid.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
February 24, 2016 Filing 56 Corrected APPLICATION for attorney Robert J. Gunther Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
February 24, 2016 Filing 55 Corrected APPLICATION for attorney David L. Cavanaugh to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Casamassima, Christopher)
February 24, 2016 Filing 54 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima on behalf of Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc. (Attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima added to party City of Hope(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima added to party Genentech, Inc.(pty:dft))(Casamassima, Christopher)
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: denying #50 APPLICATION by David L Cavanaugh to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Genentech, Inc., City of Hope.This Court requires local counsel to maintain an office within the Central District. Mr. Brausa is in Northern District. PHV Counsel will have until March 1, 2016 to comply with Local Rules. Fee shall be returned by the Clerk if counsel has not complied. (lom) Modified on 2/23/2016 (lom).
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: denying #47 APPLICATION by Robert J. Gunther Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Genentech, Inc., City of Hope. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.3.4 - This Court requires local counsel to maintain an office within the Central District. Mr. Brausa is in Northern District. PHV Counsel will have until March 1, 2016 to comply with Local Rules. Fee shall be returned by the Clerk if counsel has not complied. (lom) Modified on 2/23/2016 (lom).
February 23, 2016 Filing 51 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for attorney David L. Cavanaugh to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17325730 paid.) #50 . The following error(s) was found: See L.R. 83-2.1.3.5 Designation of Co-Counsel. An attorney may be designated as Local Counsel only if he or she: maintains an office within the District. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lom)
February 22, 2016 Filing 50 APPLICATION for attorney David L. Cavanaugh to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17325730 paid.) filed by Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brausa, Adam)
February 22, 2016 Filing 49 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for attorney Robert J. Gunther, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17314383 paid.) #47 . The following error(s) was found: See L.R. 83-2.1.3.4 Designation of Local Counsel. An attorney may be designated as Local Counsel only if he or she: (1) is a member of the Bar of this Court; and (2) maintains an office within the District. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lom)
February 19, 2016 Filing 47 APPLICATION for attorney Robert J. Gunther, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17314383 paid.) filed by Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brausa, Adam)
February 18, 2016 Filing 48 MINUTES held before Judge George H. Wu. Proceedings: Hearing re Consolidation With CV15-5685 GW (AGRx). The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court's Final Ruling. The Court declines to consolidate the Genzyme Litigation with the Regeneron Litigation. The Sanofi-Aventis and Regeneron action will be permitted to continue under the presently-existing schedule. The Court sets the following in the Genzyme Litigation: Post-Mediation Status Conference 8/4/2016 at 08:30 AM. Discovery cut-off 10/28/2016. Hearing on summary judgment motions 3/2/17 at 8:30 AM. (See document for further details).Court Reporter: Myra L. Ponce. (mg)
February 17, 2016 COUNTERCLAIM against Counter-defendant Genzyme Corporation; Jury Demand; filed by Counter-claimants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (mg)
February 17, 2016 Filing 46 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #40 JURY DEMAND. Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiff Genzyme Corp.'s First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc..(Brausa, Adam)
February 12, 2016 Filing 45 RESPONSE filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.to Statement,, #43 Response in Support of Defendants' Statement in Support of Consolidating (Brausa, Adam)
February 12, 2016 Filing 44 RESPONSIVE BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Genzyme Corp.'s Responsive Brief on Scheduling) regarding Statement,, #43 . (Mann, Elizabeth)
February 5, 2016 Filing 43 STATEMENT in Support of Consolidating Genzyme v. Genentech, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-09991-GW-AGR and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Genentech, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-05685-GW-AGR filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adam R. Brausa in Support of Consolidation, #2 Exhibit 1 to Brausa Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Brausa Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Brausa Declaration, #5 Exhibit 4 to Brausa Declaration, #6 Exhibit 5 to Brausa Declaration)(Brausa, Adam)
February 5, 2016 Filing 42 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Genzyme Corp.'s Opening Brief on Scheduling) regarding Scheduling Conference,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,,, #34 . (Mann, Elizabeth)
February 4, 2016 Filing 40 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F (1 of 3), #7 Exhibit F (2 of 3), #8 Exhibit F (3 of 3), #9 Exhibit G)(Mann, Elizabeth)
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu Granting Joint Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint #38 . 1. Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation is hereby GRANTED leave to file its First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint is deemed served upon Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope on the same day the Court enters this Order. 2. Defendants are excused from responding to the initial Complaint filed in this action; and 3. Defendants' response to Genzyme's First Amended Complaint shall be due within 14 days of the date of this Order. (mg)
February 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #37 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Brian W Nolan on behalf of Genzyme Corporation, designating Elizabeth D Mann as local counsel. (lom)
February 2, 2016 Filing 38 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to to File Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (1 of 3), #2 Exhibit A (2 of 3), #3 Exhibit A (3 of 3), #4 Proposed Order)(Mann, Elizabeth)
February 2, 2016 Filing 37 APPLICATION for attorney Brian W. Nolan to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17209917 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 29, 2016 Filing 36 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge George H. Wu: Pursuant to the request of the parties, the Scheduling Conference previously scheduled for 02/01/2016 is VACATED and TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR. Counsel will comply with the scheduling issued on January 25, 2016 (see, Docket No. 34). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 26, 2016 Filing 35 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc..(Brausa, Adam)
January 25, 2016 Filing 34 MINUTES of Scheduling Conference held before Judge George H. Wu. Court and counsel confer re consolidation with Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, et al. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., CV 15-5685-GW(AGRx). Parties will meet and confer re consolidation, and if agreeable, file a stipulation to consolidate. The scheduling conference is continued to February 1, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel will advise the clerk whether the February 1 hearing is necessary by January 28, 2016. Simultaneous briefs on the issue will be filed by February 5, 2016 if parties cannot agree. Simultaneous responses will be due by February 12, 2016, with a hearing set for February 18, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Parties may appear telephonically provided that notice is given to the clerk two business days prior to the hearing. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mg)
January 22, 2016 Filing 33 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT / City of Hope's Corporate Disclosure Statement and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Hope (Brausa, Adam)
January 22, 2016 Filing 32 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT / Genentech, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Genentech, Inc. (Brausa, Adam)
January 22, 2016 Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Adam Robert Brausa on behalf of Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc. (Attorney Adam Robert Brausa added to party City of Hope(pty:dft), Attorney Adam Robert Brausa added to party Genentech, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brausa, Adam)
January 22, 2016 Filing 30 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daralyn J Durie on behalf of Defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc. (Attorney Daralyn J Durie added to party City of Hope(pty:dft), Attorney Daralyn J Durie added to party Genentech, Inc.(pty:dft))(Durie, Daralyn)
January 20, 2016 Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation, re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #28 served on January 20, 2016. (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 19, 2016 Filing 28 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 6 to 8 days, filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation.. (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 11, 2016 Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation, upon Defendant City of Hope served on 1/6/2016, answer due 1/27/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vivian Imperial, Process Specialist at CT Corporation, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 11, 2016 Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation, upon Defendant Genentech, Inc. served on 1/6/2016, answer due 1/27/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge, Process Specialist at CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #20 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Scott A. McMurry on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Elizabeth Mann as local counsel. (lt)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #19 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Richard J. McCormick on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Elizabeth Mann as local counsel. (lt)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #18 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Lisa M. Ferri on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Elizabeth Mann as local counsel. (lt)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for January 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court not later than January 19, 2016. See Local Rule 26-1. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to all parties that have appeared in this action, and is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference immediately to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. (lom)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
January 6, 2016 Filing 20 APPLICATION for attorney Scott A. McMurry to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17053446 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 6, 2016 Filing 19 APPLICATION for attorney Richard J. McCormick to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17053436 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 6, 2016 Filing 18 APPLICATION for attorney Lisa M. Ferri to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-17053416 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 15-05685 GW(AGRx). Case transferred from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 15-09991 GW(AGRx). Signed by Judge George H. Wu (rn)
January 5, 2016 Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants City of Hope, Genentech, Inc.. (lc)
January 4, 2016 Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Mann, Elizabeth)
January 4, 2016 Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Scott McMurry for Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (rn)
January 4, 2016 Filing 13 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Richard J McCormick for Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (rn)
January 4, 2016 Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Lisa M Ferri for Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (rn)
January 4, 2016 Filing 11 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Brian W Nolan for Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (rn)
January 4, 2016 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 , Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The space below the caption entitled To:Defendant(s):must contain the names of all defendants or be left blank. The court does not issue single summonses to individual defendants. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (rn)
January 4, 2016 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (rn)
December 30, 2015 Filing 8 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Genzyme Corporation. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. Related Case(s): 2:15-cv-05685-GW-AGR (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation identifying Sanofi, S.A. as Corporate Parent. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation, identifying Plaintiff/Parent Corporation Sanofi, S.A. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Mann, Elizabeth)
December 30, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17024141 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Genzyme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F-1, #7 Exhibit F-2, #8 Exhibit F-3, #9 Exhibit G) (Attorney Elizabeth D Mann added to party Genzyme Corporation(pty:pla))(Mann, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genzyme Corporation v. Genentech, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hope
Represented By: Christian G Kiely
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Casamassima
Represented By: David L Cavanaugh
Represented By: Sonal Naresh Mehta
Represented By: Amanda L Major
Represented By: Kevin S Prussia
Represented By: Daralyn J Durie
Represented By: Robert J Gunther, Jr
Represented By: Adam Robert Brausa
Represented By: Kelly Elizabeth Halford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genentech, Inc.
Represented By: Christian G Kiely
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Casamassima
Represented By: David L Cavanaugh
Represented By: Sonal Naresh Mehta
Represented By: Amanda L Major
Represented By: Kevin S Prussia
Represented By: Daralyn J Durie
Represented By: Robert J Gunther, Jr
Represented By: Adam Robert Brausa
Represented By: Kelly Elizabeth Halford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth D Mann
Represented By: Brian W Nolan
Represented By: Scott McMurry
Represented By: Richard J McCormick
Represented By: Lisa M Ferri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?