Ricki Sue Martin v. US Bank, N.A. et al
| Ricki Sue Martin |
| Does and US Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2016cv00101 |
| January 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the parties status report (ECF No. 15), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than May 9, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. However, the Court expects a more detailed explanation regarding the delay in executing the agreement. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies withFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. (lc)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II.In light of the parties status report (ECF No. 13), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than April 8, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 41. (lc)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the parties recent settlement (ECF No. 11), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 3/8/2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar, including the hearingon Defendants Motion to Dismiss, and may be reset upon application to the Court. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (vv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
