Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Juoda Dvora et al
| Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. |
| Juoda Dvora and Tami Dvora |
| 2:2016cv00206 |
| January 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F. MacKinnon |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION UPON CONSENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons acting in concert and participation with them, and their successors and assigns, jointly and severally be and hereby are, permanently restrained and enjoined. Further ORDERED that in the event that Defendants are ever found by a court of competent jurisdiction, after notice and opportunity to be heard, to be in violation of this Final Judgment the parties agree that (a) Rolex will be entitled to all normal relief which it may request from the court; and (b) Rolex will be entitled to recover any and all future and additional damages, fees and costs incurred by Rolex due to Defendants' violation of this Final Judgment, and judgment shall be entered against Defendant in that full amount. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
15
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/1/2016. (vdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
