Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Spark Networks, Inc.
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| Spark Networks, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00287 |
| January 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by counterdefendant Scottsdale Insurance Company.(Silver, Robert) |
Filing 33
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of parties response to the Order to Show Cause, filed June 3, 2016, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By June 16, 2016 the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of June 17, 2016. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The Order to Show Cause [ 17] is DISCHARGED. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (kti)
|
| Filing 32 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc., Counter Claimant Spark Networks, Inc.to Order to Show Cause,,, #31 and Notice of Settlement (Pines, Adam) |
|
Filing 31
(IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders counter claimant to show cause in writing on or before June 8, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to counter defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company for lack of prosecution as to the counterclaim. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by counter claimant is due. This action will be dismissed as to counter defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company as to the counterclaim if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/30/16 (early mediation); 2/21/17. Joint report re results of early mediation due by 7/7/16; joint status report re settlement due by 2/28/17; no appearance necessary. (iv)
|
|
Filing 29
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Amended Pleadings due by 8/5/2016. Discovery cut-off 12/13/2016. Exhibit List due by 2/28/2017. Motions in Limine to be filed by 2/28/2017. Motions due by 12/23/2016. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/28/2017. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 2/21/2017. Status Report due by 2/28/2017. Witness List due by 2/28/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/21/2017 at 2:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Jury Trial set for 4/18/2017 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL & TRIAL DATES) (iv)
|
|
Filing 28
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM #18 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of the foregoing, Scottsdale's motion to dismiss the second counterclaim is DENIED. Scottsdale shall file its Answer to the Counterclaims within 15 days from the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing 27
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim #18 presently scheduled for hearing on May 6, 2016, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The scheduling conference on May 6, 2016 is also VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Joint Rule 26(f) Report filed 4/21/2016 #24 The following error(s) was found: Document is unsigned by defense counsel. The signature of Attorney Adam Pines is represented on the document with an "/s/." The filer does not indicate that the other signatory listed concurs in the filing's content and has authorized the filing, Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i). In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 25 REPLY Yes Motion to Dismiss (Punitive Damages) filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Scottsdale Compendium of Authorities ISO Reply to Opp to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim with Exh 1-4, #2 Exhibit Exh 5-6 to Compendium of Authorities ISO Reply to Opp to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim, #3 Exhibit Exh 7-9 to Compendium of Authorities ISO Reply to Opp to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim, #4 Exhibit Exh 10-11 to Compendium of Authorities ISO Reply to Opp to Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim)(Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 24 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT of JOINT RULE 26(f) filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Schedule of PreTrial and Trial Dates)(Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 23 DECLARATION of Adam Pines re MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion #22 filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc.. (Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim #18 filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc.. (Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jim S Byun counsel for Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. Dean B. Herman is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Change of Lead Counsel filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company, (Byun, Jim) |
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court sua sponte advances the scheduling conference presently set on May 6, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. NOTE CHANGE IN TIME ONLY. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc.'s Counterclaim filed by defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 5/6/2016 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc. (Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 16 DEFENDANT SPARK NETWORKS, INC.S CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Spark Networks, Inc., (Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 15 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26 (f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee is set for hearing 5/6/2016 at 11:00 AM. (iv) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc.. correcting Answer to Complaint #12 (Pines, Adam) |
| (DUPLICATE ENTRY) COUNTERCLAIM against Counterdefendant Scottsdale Insurance Company with Jury Demand filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Spark Networks, Inc. (Answer and Counterclaim filed as one document, see document number 12) (gk) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 and Counterclaim Against Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc..(Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JURY DEMAND. and Counterclaim Against Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc..(Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Spark Networks, Inc. answer now due 3/7/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Spark Networks, Inc..(Attorney Adam Pines added to party Spark Networks, Inc.(pty:dft))(Pines, Adam) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company, upon Defendant Spark Networks, Inc. served on 1/18/2016, answer due 2/8/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael S. Egan, CEO in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Byun, Jim) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Spark Networks, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Corporate Disclosure Statement Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company, identifying Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Byun, Jim) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-17097711 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jim S Byun added to party Scottsdale Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Byun, Jim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Spark Networks, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Dean B Herman |
| Represented By: | Robert Scott Silver |
| Represented By: | Jim S Byun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Spark Networks, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Adam Pines |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
