Jane Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
| Jane Doe |
| Steven Carnine, Thomas Iannucci, Michelle King, Los Angeles Unified School District, Paul Revere Charter Middle School and Magnet Center and Christopher Perdigao |
| 2:2016cv00305 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Education |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
MINUTES OF TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE RE: SEALED PETITION FOR COURT APPROVAL OF COMPROMISE; HENNIG RUIZ P.C.'S MOTION TO INTERVENE 176 held before Judge Christina A. Snyder. Hennig Ruizs motion to intervene is GRANTED. The Complaint in Int ervention is deemed filed today. No later than August 15, 2017, Hennig Ruiz P.C. is ordered to file a memorandum, and any supporting evidence, setting forth its position regarding its attorneys lien and plaintiff's petition for approval of the compromise in this matter. No later than August 22, 2017, plaintiff may file a responsive memorandum and any supporting evidence. If any defendants wish to be heard on this matter, they shall file a responsive brief no later than August 24, 2017. T he Court hereby schedules a hearing on plaintiff's petition for approval of compromise on September 11, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Insofar as they elect not to file any briefing on this matter, defendants will be permitted to appear telephonically. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (lom)
|
|
Filing
170
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 6/19/2017 Rob Hennig and Hennig Ruiz P.C. (collectively "Hennig") filed the instant motion to invervene and stay consideration of Plaintiff's Petition for Court Approval of the Compromise of Disputed Claim pending resolution of Hennig's motion to intervene 167 . Hennig's Motion is DENIED without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
155
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: LAUSD'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE (Dkt Nos. 103-110); CARNINE'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE (Dkt Nos. 112-117). The LAUSD defendants' first 103 , fifth 107 , and sixth motions in lim ine 108 are GRANTED. The LAUSD defendants' seventh motion in limine 109 is DENIED. The Court reserves ruling upon the LAUSD defendants' second 104 and third motions in limine 105 until trial. The Court reserves ruling on the LAUSD d efendants' fourth motion in limine 106 until such time as the parties have fully briefed the admissibility of Lester's expert opinions or, alternatively, defendants indicate that they will oppose no other portions of Lester's propose d testimony. The Court reserves ruling on the LAUSD defendants' eighth motion in limine 110 until the Court has reviewed the evidence at issue. Carnine's first motion in limine 112 is GRANTED. Carnine's second 113 , third 114 , a nd fifth motions in limine 116 are DENIED. The Court reserves ruling on the LAUSD defendants' fourth motion in limine 115 until such time as the parties have fully briefed the admissibility of Lester's expert opinions or, alternatively, defendants indicate that they will oppose no other portions of Lester's proposed testimony. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
127
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Present or prior counsel's errors in managing plaintiffs documents and files do not present good cause for continuing the trial because they are uniquely within one party's control. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial Date and Modify Scheduling Order 94 is DENIED. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
91
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Steven Carnine's Motion for Summary Judgment 76 ; and Los Angeles Unified School District, Paul Revere Middle School, Christopher Perdigao, and Thomas Iannucci's Motion for Summary Judgment 78 . Defendants' motions for summary judgment are hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
65
MINUTES OF Defendant Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff Fist Amended Complaint 58 before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants motion to dismiss portions of plaintiff first amended complaint. Specif ically, the Court GRANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendants motion to dismiss plaintiff Third Claim and DENIES defendants motion to dismiss plaintiff Fourth and Fifth Claims. Plaintiff is hereby granted thirty(30) days in which to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of plaintiff Third Claim with prejudice. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
