Arthur Gaspard v. N. Romero
Plaintiff: Arthur Gaspard
Defendant: N. Romero
Case Number: 2:2016cv00318
Filed: January 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith 72 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed withprejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his Second Amended Complaint and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arthur Gaspard v. N. Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Gaspard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?