A. Edward Ezor v. Reva G. Goetz et al
| A. Edward Ezor |
| Reva G. Goetz, Estate of H. Walter Croskey, Patti S. Kitching, Richard D. Aldrich, Beverly Hills Escrow, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Robert Brown and Ellie Page |
| 2:2016cv00562 |
| January 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 ABSTRACT of Judgment re: USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order, #36 (Squire, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/19/2018 (hr). |
Filing 39
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #38 , re: USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order #37 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file a corrected document with a Title Page as soon as possible. (hr)
|
| Filing 38 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: re: USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order #37 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. See Local Rule 11-3.8 Title Page. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 37 **STRICKEN PER DOCKET NO. #39 ** re: USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order, #36 (Squire, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/15/2018 (hr). |
|
Filing 36
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 filed by A. Edward Ezor. CCA # 16-55801. Attorney's fees in the amount of $20,387.50 are awarded in favor of appellee Estate of Robert Brown and against appellant A. Edward Ezor. This order amends the courts mandate.(mat)
|
| Filing 35 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 , CCA # 16-55801. The judgment of the 9th Circuit Court, entered October 04, 2017, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of the 9th CCA issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Memorandum #32 AFFIRMED, and USCA Order #34 ](mat) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 filed by A. Edward Ezor. CCA # 16-55801. Ezor's motion to recall the mandate is granted. The mandate shall reissue forthwith. Appellee Estate of Robert Brown's application for an award of attorney'sfees pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 is granted in part. Appellee is awarded attorney's fees incurred on appeal only. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case, except for any motion for reconsideration of the Appellate Commissioners order awarding attorneys fees. (mat)
|
| Filing 33 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 CCA # 16-55801. The judgment of the 9th Circuit Court, entered October 04, 2017, takes effect this date.This constitutes the formal mandate of the 9th CCA issued pursuant to Rule41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Memorandum #32 AFFIRMED.] (mat) |
| Filing 32 MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 filed by A. Edward Ezor. CCA # 16-55801. The Decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. (lc) |
|
Filing 31
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISMISSAL by Judge James V. Selna: denying #30 MOTION for Reconsideration. On August 17, 2016, Plaintiff filed "Plaintiff's Objection to Order of Dismissal Dated July 7, 2016." Plaintiff contends that this Court did not have jurisdiction to enter the dismissal after he filed a Notice of Appeal. The Court construes Plaintiff's objection as a motion for reconsideration. So construed, Plaintiff's motion is without merit. A Notice of Appeal from a nonappealable order does not divest a district court of jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (kl) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge James V. Selna, re R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, #22 . On April 27, 2016, the Court accepted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint against the remaining defendants within 30 days after entry of the order, or May 27, 2016. Plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint. Moreover, on June 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mp)
|
| Filing 28 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant Robert Brown. (Squire, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 27 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 16-55801, 9th Circuit regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 as to Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (mat) |
| APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 as to Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor; Receipt Number: LA137328 in the amount of $505. (jtil) |
| Filing 26 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #25 . (mat) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEAL to all Orders, Judgments and rulings to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. Filing fee $ 505 billed. (mat) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER by Judge James V. Selna denying #23 MOTION for Reconsideration. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to reconsider is DENIED. (see document for details). (dro)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Reconsider and Reverse April 27, 2016 Order #22 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of A Edward Ezor in Support Thereof; Exhibit filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. Motion set for hearing on 6/27/2016 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (mt) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) #19 . IT IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff's claims against Judge Geotz, Estate of Justice H. Walter Croskey, Justice Kitching and Justice Aldrich are dismissed without leave to amend and (2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint against the remaining defendants within 30 days after the entry of this order. (mp)
|
| Filing 21 PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE #19 filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (kl) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF FILING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2016. A party may respond to another party's Objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Objections. (See Attachment for Further Details) (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation) (kl) |
| Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. For the reasons discussed above, it is recommended that the district court issue an order (1) accepting this Report's findings and recommendation; (2) dismissing without leave to amend Plaintiff's claims against Judge Goetz, Estate of Justice H. Walter Croskey, Justice Kitching and Justice Aldrich; and (3) granting leave to file a First Amended Complaint against the remaining defendants. (See Attachment for Further Details) (kl) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER RE DISCOVERY AND MOTIONS [CIVIL RIGHTS] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. All discovery shall be completed on or before October 14, 2016. Each party shall file and serve a status report on or before June 14, 2016. Any motions directed to the court's jurisdiction or to the merits of any claim or defense (such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment) shall be filed and served not later than November 14, 2016. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 and affirmative defenses filed by defendant Robert Brown.(Attorney Jeffrey Craig Squire added to party Robert Brown(pty:dft))(Squire, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER Denying Motion to Recuse #13 by Judge James V. Selna: The Motion is without basis and is denied. See document for further information. (lwag)
|
| Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNILATERALLY SET BY THE DISTRICT COURT ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 9, 2016 #8 filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (kl) |
| Filing 14 REFERRAL OF MOTION to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg has been filed. Pursuant to GO 14-03 and Local Rule 72-5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg #13 is referred to Judge James V. Selna for determination. (rn) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of A. Edward Ezor in Support thereof filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (rn) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice (Other) #9 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The document is stricken. (kl) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #9 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: Other: Parties cannot electronically file documents on behalf of pro-se litigants. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (kl) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to All Defendants. (kl) |
| Filing 9 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #11 ***NOTICE of Dismissal of Beverly Hills Escrow filed by Defendant Beverly Hills Escrow. without prejudice (Davis, Matthew) Modified on 2/26/2016 (kl). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On January 26, 2016, Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the Anti-Injunction Act. Alternatively, judicial immunity appears to shield the judges from Plaintiff's claims against them. The court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause on or before March 9, 2016, (a) why this court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims; and (b) why the judicial defendants, namely Reva G. Goetz, Estate of H. Walter Croskey, Patti S. Kitching, and Richard D. Aldrich, should not be dismissed from the action. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for pre-trial proceedings. All future pleadings shall be addressed to Marine Pogosyan, Clerk to Magistrate Judge Rosenberg, United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. Plaintiff shall promptly proceed with service of the summons and complaint on all named defendants. Service of the summons and complaint must comply with the provisions of Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall file one copy of the proof of service showing compliance with this order within 90 days of filing the complaint, i.e., no later than May 5, 2016. Non-compliance with this paragraph may result in issuance of an order to show cause re dismissal for failure to prosecute. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (rn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR:Upon further review, a determination was made that this case was improperly assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Due to the nature of the claims, this complaint falls under the scope of General Order 05-07 and is, therefore, reassigned to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Alicia Rosenberg due to the presence of a prior case involving the same party. All future filings in this case should be directed to Magistrate Judge Rosenberg. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:16-cv-00562 JVS(AGR). (rn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (et) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Richard D. Aldrich, Beverly Hills Escrow, Robert Brown, Estate of H. Walter Croskey, Reva G. Goetz, Patti S. Kitching, Ellie Page. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Richard D. Aldrich, Beverly Hills Escrow, Robert Brown, Estate of H. Walter Croskey, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Reva G. Goetz, Patti S. Kitching, Ellie Page. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish.(Filing fee $ 400 FEE PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff A. Edward Ezor. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
