Martin Vogel v. Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Martin Vogel v. Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC

Martin Vogel v. Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC

Plaintiff:	Martin Vogel
Defendant:	Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC
Case Number:	2:2016cv00822
Filed:	February 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	S. James Otero
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2016	Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge S. James Otero: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 30, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court wil l consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date:Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default; In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (vv)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2016

Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge S. James Otero: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 30, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court wil l consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date:Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default; In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (vv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin Vogel v. Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bellflower 91 Plaza, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Represented By:	Disabled Advocacy Group APLC
Represented By:	Khushpreet R Mehton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?