Rosa Duarte v. Wells Fargo Mortgage et al
Rosa Duarte |
Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
2:2016cv00991 |
February 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
George H. King |
Jean P. Rosenbluth |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order re: Motion to Remand 13 by Judge George H. King. Defendant has failed to establish that we have subject matter jurisdiction over this action, and removal was improper. We thus GRANT Plaintiff's Motion and REMAN D this action to the state court from which it was removed. The clerk shall effectuate such remand forthwith. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, 14 , is DENIED without prejudice to its reassertion in state court. The hearing set for Monday, April 25, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (mailed 4/22/16) (lom) |
Filing 20 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. King taking under submission 13 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: On the court's own motion, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 13 , noticed for hearing on APRIL 18, 2016, is TAKEN OFF C ALENDAR and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated. (bm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.