Raymund Navarro et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Raymund Navarro and Steven Ray
Defendant: Does and Medtronic, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv01166
Filed: February 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Gail J. Standish
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Percy Anderson: On February 25, 2016, the Court issued an order provisionally remanding this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court as a result of a procedural defect in the Notice of Removal. The Court stayed the order remanding the action to provide plaintiffs Raymund Navarro and Steven Ray with an opportunity to object to the remand and waive the procedural defect. Specifically, Plaintiffs were directed to inform the Court in writing by March 3, 2016 if they objected to the remand. To date, despite the passage of the deadline set by the Court, Plaintiffs have not waived the procedural defect. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the February 25, 2016 Order, this action is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC603415. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (mg)
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Percy Anderson: Proceedings: Court Order: The Court concludes that Defendant's second Notice of Removal is procedurally defective. Accordingly, this action is remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court , Case No. BC603415. The Court stays this order until March 3, 2016. If Plaintiffs wish to remain in federal court and thereby waive the procedural defect discussed above, Plaintiffs shall notify the Court in writing on or before March 3, 2016. (mg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymund Navarro et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc.
Represented By: Jill S Casselman
Represented By: Michael A Geibelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymund Navarro
Represented By: Brianna M Primozic
Represented By: Howard Z Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Ray
Represented By: Brianna M Primozic
Represented By: Howard Z Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?