GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Acme Duplicating and Printing, Inc. et al
| Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund |
| A Superior Printer, LLC and Acme Duplicating and Printing, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv01305 |
| February 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, in favor of Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund, GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund are hereby awarded final judgment against Defendants Acme Duplicating and Printing, Inc., and A Superior Printe r LLC in the sum of $396,856.00. Plaintiffs are further awarded prejudgment interest in the amount of $74,203.43. Plaintiffs are further awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $13,021.19 and costs in the amount$689.90. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: In light of the Default By Clerk entered on April 21, 2016, the Court sets a hearing for Order To Show Cause Re Default Judgment for May 23, 2016 at 11:30 a.m. If a Motion for Default Judgment is filed prior to this hearing, the hearing on the Order To Show Cause will be discharged, and no appearance will be necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
