Guy Hart et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
Guy Hart, Leemor Hart Lavy and Zeev Lavy |
Bank of America, Bayview Loan Servicing, Does and Law Offices of Les Zieve |
REO Partners, LLC |
2:2016cv01309 |
February 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F. MacKinnon |
Christina A. Snyder |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 MINUTES OF Telephone Hearing on Defendants Bayview Loan Servicing, Bank of America, and Law Offices of Les Zieve's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS defendants 9; motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 57 . Because further amendment of the complaint would likely be futile, the Court dismisses this action WITH PREJUDICE. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk) |
Filing 54 MINUTES OF HEARING BY TELEPHONE ON DEFENDANTS BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, BANK OF AMERICA, AND LAW OFFICES OF LES ZIEVE'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 40 , filed June 14, 2016) held before Judge Christina A. S nyder: In accordance with the foregoing, the Court GRANTS defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a second amended complaint on or before August 1, 2016 alleging additional facts in support of their claims for wrongful foreclosure and declaratory relief. Plaintiffs are not granted leave to assert any additional claims beyond their claims for wrongful foreclosure and declaratory relief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (clee) |
Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss 7 and Defendant REO Partners, LLC's Motion to Dismiss 12 . Defendants' respective motions to dismiss are hereby GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 21 days to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to do so may result in dismissal with prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.