Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Endure Holdings, LLC et al
Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
Robert Carlson, Does, Endure Holdings, LLC, Randall Oser and Roger A. Tichenor |
2:2016cv01405 |
February 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R. Gary Klausner |
Jean P. Rosenbluth |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT CARLSON by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that Judgment shall be and is hereby entered against Defendant Robert Carlson in the above-captioned action as follows: The Court finds that Car lson committed the acts referred to in Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Robert Carlson and that Carlson's acts constitute: Defendant is ordered to pay damages to Plaintiffs in the amount of $209,246.40. The Court finds t hat for purposes of 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), this constitutes an exceptional case meriting the award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $7,785, calculated pursuant to the schedule contained in Local Rule 55-3., in favor of Absorption Pharmaceuticals, LLC against Robert Carlson in the principal amount of $209,246.40, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $7,785, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $217,031.40. (bp) |
Filing 22 [In Chambers] Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution for Robert Carlson by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/10/2016. (ah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.