Chris Langer v. Cheng L. Hsiao et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does, Cheng L. Hsiao and Shing Hua Hsiao |
| 2:2016cv01415 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Having received the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal filed June 27, 2016 23 , and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the above captioned action, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 8, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
