Andrew J. Perez, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
Andrew J. Perez, Irene E. Perez and Quality Sweeping Service |
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
2:2016cv01597 |
March 8, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A. Oliver |
Manuel L. Real |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, JUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") has demonstrated there is no genuin e issue of material fact pertaining to the running of the applicable statutes of limitation. For their part, Plaintiffs have not sustained their burden of producing competent evidence to establish a genuine dispute as to any material fact and cannot rely on mere allegations or denials in the pleadings. Chase is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Chase's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is granted. For each cause of action alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint, judgment is entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Chase, and Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Chase is entitled to recover its costs as against Plaintiffs. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.