Teresa McClendon v. ALS et al
| Teresa McClendon |
| ALS, Does and Park Homes and The Lofts Community Association |
| 2:2016cv01690 |
| March 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to Plaintiff Teresa McClendon's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (ECFNo. 28 ), and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Feder al Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), the entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are vacated and taken off calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 21 . PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL OCTOBER 21, 2016 TO FILE AN AMENDED REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 9/30/2016 (lc).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT PARK HOMES AND THE LOFTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 20 . Further, since Plaintiff has failed to properly serve this Defendant, the case is DISMISSED as to Defendant Park Homes and the Lofts Community Association without prejudice. by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) Modified on 9/16/2016. (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
