Lakhi Sakhrani et al v. City of San Gabriel et al
| Quality Dialysis Center Las Tunas, LLC, Dr. Lakhi Sakhrani and Priya Sakhrani |
| City of San Gabriel, Juli Costanzo, John Harrington, Jason Pu and Kevin Sawkins |
| 2:2016cv01756 |
| March 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Reasonable Accommodation Claim 95 is DENIED. Court Reporter: Nichole Forest. (gk)
|
|
Filing
142
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL (Filed January 30, 2017, Dkt. 92 ) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs motion for sanctions pursuant to Fe deral Rule of Civil Procedure 11, dkt. 92, as well as the opposition, dkt. 130, and reply, dkt. 135. The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 715. Accordingly, the hearing date of F ebruary 27, 2017, is hereby vacated, and the matter is hereby taken under submission. Given the voluminous discovery in this case, and the myriad factual and legal issues it presents, the foregoing issue with an isolated sentence in the Kress decl aration does not warrant the sanctions sought by plaintiff. Nor does the other behavior, albeit troubling, of which plaintiff complains. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for sanctions is DENIED. However, the Court will not tolerate inaccurate declarations or unprofessional conduct. The parties are both admonished and directed to deal with one another in a truthful and professional manner. Failure to do so may result in sanctions in the future. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
131
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder re: 85 MOTION to Strike. (See document for specifics) (mrgo).
|
|
Filing
83
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Writ of Mandate Claim 59 ; Ex Parte Application to Strike Portion of Kress Declaration ISO Defendant's Opposition 79 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff� 39;s motion for partial summary judgment 59 is DENIED without prejudice. In light of the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to strike a portion of the evidence in support of defendant's opposition in this matter 79 is DENIED as moot. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
