Dun-Dee, Inc. v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Dun-Dee, Inc. v. United States of America

Dun-Dee, Inc. v. United States of America

Plaintiff:	Dun-Dee, Inc.
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2016cv01766
Filed:	March 15, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge:	Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit:	Taxes

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 7, 2016	Filing 23 MINUTES(IN CHAMBERS) - DISMISSAL BY COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. WHEREAS, on August 15, 2016, the Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss complaint, allowing plaintiff to file an amended complaint addressing (1) the deficiencies i dentified within that order and (2) those issues addressed by the Court at oral argument on the instant motion 22 . An amended complaint was to be filed and served no later than August 29, 2016. As of today's date, no such response has been received by this Court; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
August 15, 2016	Filing 22 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01500 Dkt. 14; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01558 Dkt. 14; Defendant's Motion to Di smiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01766 Dkt. 16 ; and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-02160 Dkt. 12. The government's motion to dismiss the instant suit, Case No. 2:16-cv-01500-CAS-RAO, is hereby GRANTED. As explained supra at 1-2, based upon the Court's disposition of the instant motion to dismiss, the related actionsCase Nos. 2:16-cv-01558-CAS-RAO, 2:16-cv-01766-CAS-RAO, and 2:16-cv-02160-CAS-RAOare similarly DISMISSED. Plaintiff Kimdun and the plaintiffs in the related actions are granted 14 days from the date of this order to file amended complaints addressing (1) the deficiencies identified herein and (2) those issues addressed by the Court at oral argument on the instant motion. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 7, 2016

Filing 23 MINUTES(IN CHAMBERS) - DISMISSAL BY COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. WHEREAS, on August 15, 2016, the Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss complaint, allowing plaintiff to file an amended complaint addressing (1) the deficiencies i dentified within that order and (2) those issues addressed by the Court at oral argument on the instant motion 22 . An amended complaint was to be filed and served no later than August 29, 2016. As of today's date, no such response has been received by this Court; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled action is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

August 15, 2016

Filing 22 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01500 Dkt. 14; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01558 Dkt. 14; Defendant's Motion to Di smiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-01766 Dkt. 16 ; and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Case No. 16-cv-02160 Dkt. 12. The government's motion to dismiss the instant suit, Case No. 2:16-cv-01500-CAS-RAO, is hereby GRANTED. As explained supra at 1-2, based upon the Court's disposition of the instant motion to dismiss, the related actionsCase Nos. 2:16-cv-01558-CAS-RAO, 2:16-cv-01766-CAS-RAO, and 2:16-cv-02160-CAS-RAOare similarly DISMISSED. Plaintiff Kimdun and the plaintiffs in the related actions are granted 14 days from the date of this order to file amended complaints addressing (1) the deficiencies identified herein and (2) those issues addressed by the Court at oral argument on the instant motion. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dun-Dee, Inc. v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dun-Dee, Inc.
Represented By:	Dennis N Brager
Represented By:	Richard G Stack
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?