In re: Loren Miller and Sarah Miller
| Jeremy W. Faith |
| Loren Miller |
| Loren Miller and Sarah Miller |
| 2:2016cv02008 |
| March 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE APPEALS OF BANKRUPTCY COURT'S ORDERS [ 2 , 6 ] by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: The Court reiterates that this ruling has not bearing on the substance of Appellant's Appeals; rather, the Court merely concludes that its does not have jurisdiction to hear these appeals at this time. For the foregoing reasons, Appellant's appeals of the four Bankruptcy Court decisions are hereby DISMISSED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: the Court hereby dismisses the action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to respond to the Courts Order to Show Cause. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: BANKRUPTCY APPEAL by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing, on or before September 12, 2016 why the Order appealed from should not be affirmed for failure to comply with this Court's orders. If the required action has been taken, no further response to this order to show cause is necessary. See minute order for further details. (jy)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: BANKRUPTCY APPEAL by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Appellant is ordered to show cause in writing on or before May 11, 2016, whythis appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant has failed to file: the statement of issues on appeal.the notice re reporter's transcript; the appeal brief. Accordingly, Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing, on or before May 11, 2016 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
