Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. DRG Fence Incorporated et al
| Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company |
| Business Alliance Insurance Company, DRG Fence Incorporated and Randy Joseph Noriega |
| 2:2016cv02059 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK: The $33,626.28 Judgment against DRG FENCE is renewed as follows: a. Total Judgment.... $33,626.28.; b. Costs after Judgment.... $0.00; c. Less Credits after Judgment.... - $18,770.83; d. Interest a fter Judgment computed from e. November 7, 2016 to September 16, 2022 at 0.64%; f. (accruing at $0.28 per day).... $848.90; TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT.... $15,704.35. The $24,515.49 Judgment against DRG FENCE and NORIEGA is re newed as follows: a. Total Judgment.... $24,515.49; b. Costs after Judgment.... $0.00; c. Less Credits after Judgment.... -$18,770.83; d. Interest after Judgment computed from e. November 7, 2016 to September 16, 2022 at 0.64%; f. (accruing at $0.11 per day).... $501.74; TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT.... $6,246.40. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment, 54 , 113 . (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
